The Killer Application

I’ve come to the realization – a bit late in life you may think – that the killer application doesn’t exist. For many years, the Telco industry was obsessed with identifying the killer application that would justify the huge investments they were making in core and access bandwidth. Some thought it was video-conferencing, others thought video-on-demand, and there are some present-day advocates of IPTV. The thinking has always been that if only they could identify the killer application, then they could invest heavily in it and generate extraordinary profits.

 

But this sort of linear thinking is simply too slow-paced for the market we find ourselves in. The reality is that there probably is no killer application, no silver bullet that the Telcos can latch onto to carry them into a 21st century that gives them similar levels of return to the 20th century bonanza. Instead, there are probably hundreds - perhaps thousands - of niche applications, each of which will deliver a nice level of return. And the only way to find which of these work for you is to try out lots of them, ramp up the ones that work, and discontinue the ones that fail.  

 

All of which brings me back to one of my favorite topics – Service Delivery Platforms. This is the vision that underpins the investment in SDPs. Create a platform that gives Service Providers the flexibility to launch thousands of applications at low cost and the scalability to ramp up the five or 10 that generate some real return.

 

Typically, there are two sides to this equation, and a great SDP is only half of it. The other half is all about fine-tuning the rest of the Service Provider’s performance so that they can maximize customer satisfaction and profitability. In order to do this, Service Providers need to understand how good or bad their existing performance is. TM Forum has a Business Benchmarking program that enables Service Providers to benchmark their performance across a wide range of industry-agreed metrics. This allows them to see where they are doing well and where they need to invest to improve. In a couple of weeks, we will be releasing a free industry report on some of the industry benchmarks to date based on input from a wide range of Service Providers, so definitely watch this space!

 

Of course in the meantime if you know what the real Killer Application is then send your ideas on a postcard to Martin Creaner……..


Posted Oct 25 2007, 04:28 PM by Rebecca Huft

Comments

Ian Best wrote re: The Killer Application
on 11-01-2007 5:16 AM
While I share your enthusiam re SDPs, I do seem to remember similar discussions about IN platforms a few years back ... are we really going to get it right this time?
Mike Kelly wrote re: The Killer Application
on 11-01-2007 7:06 AM
The search for the next Killer Application is a long one, and could be a little like "Jaws" - it turns around and bites you if you catch it.

The days when PCs were sold as single program engines for software like Lotus 1-2-3, are long gone; there are few users who now have such a focused and limited view of how they use their computers. Telecoms has undergone a similar explosion in the richness and compelxity of services and options becoming available - I see in Keith Willett's blog alongside this one, discussion of mobile Skype service and the further sea change this may herald.

It would seem perverse in such an exciting environment (even if it's not as comfortable as once was the case) to try to squeeze customers into a single way of working around some "Killer App". And if this was to happen, it surely would not take them long to break loose, and start hunting around - just like that shark.

Adding into this the merging of traditional telecoms with the newer business areas, like cable, media. content, etc, and we have a heady mix where any single approach - Killer or otherwise - is just not going to cut it. Surely the essence of how we need to progress is through flexibility and an agnosticism on how the industry will continue to evolve. It would be a bold voice that says the next ten years for our sector are predictable.

We need to work together on this though, to establish common understanding wherever this is helpful for the industry, and to avoid unnecessary conflicts in areas where competition is not the issue. And we need to do this without constraining evolution either. Companies have really to be prepared to jump in any direction as the situation develops - putting your eggs in one place will probably just mean you end up with them on your face. Not an easy balance, but hopefully TM Forum can help in this, as a meeting place and neutral common ground to work things out.

The bottom line is it's probably not the best strategy to paddle your own canoe here - as Richard Dreyfus says in the movie, you're going to need a bigger boat.

MikeK
Ram Dixit wrote re: The Killer Application
on 11-03-2007 10:59 PM
Most Telecom Service Providers (TSP) still hold direct relationships with subscribers. And they have the best device, network and hosting infrastructure to offer variety of applications to their subscribers. Today the network, hardware and software technology have advanced to a such an extent that many entrepreneurs are able to develop and launch new platforms and applications in very short time. So there is big opportunity for TSPs to play their part as you suggested like implementing Service Delivery Platforms (SDP). They have to promote SDP among new generation developers and also brand their applications well. This should see more "killer" apps. My definition of Killer apps is "most popular applications of the season" and sure there will be more such applications.

Ram
Leonel Erlichman wrote re: The Killer Application
on 11-05-2007 12:14 PM
It is not a contradiction to maintain the idea that the killer applications do not exist and in the other hand promote the Service Delivery Platforms (SDP) as the future of the industry customer satisfaction and profitability; or you has found in SDP its killer application?.
Martin Creaner wrote re: The Killer Application
on 12-13-2007 7:59 AM
LeoneIE.  Good point. I don't think it is a contradiction to doubt the existance of a killer application and the belief that SDP is so important.  I see SDP as a means to exploit great services and so it is important in that respect, but it is not the killer application itself.
Martin Creaner wrote re: The Killer Application
on 12-13-2007 8:01 AM
Ram D.  I like your definition of killer app.  Not so much killer app, but best of the bunch.  and there will always be one of these.  but nobody should expect that any one application is going to save a telco.  telco's need to continually look for the next best of the bunch application and never stop evolving.
Jeffrey Lam wrote re: The Killer Application
on 07-03-2008 2:57 AM
In China ,Killer application about 3G may be lay on video conference or  other video-based application ,  TD-CDMA will be launched at 29th Olmypic  Game.

               Jeffrey Lam
             
                  email: linjinfeng@gmail.com
                   CISA,CGEIT
 
                 Chinamobile  
Jeffrey Lam wrote re: The Killer Application
on 07-03-2008 3:00 AM
This is voice from  Chinamobile
Karmvir Mehr wrote re: The Killer Application
on 08-20-2008 10:33 AM
SMS was and I think in some parts of the globe still the killer app for telco's. However not sure why and how we can relate a killer app with SDP ? SDP is just an mechanism / or engine to deliver apps onto the customer's handset and has nothing to do with a killer app..